My two questions and why they matter

All right. So there are two questions that animate this soon-to-be-renamed blog.

  1. What is the role of philanthropy in a democratic society?
  2. What does it mean to democratize philanthropy?

Why do these questions matter now?

First of all, it’s important to distinguish between individual, major-donor, and institutional philanthropy. Individual philanthropy is what you or I do – give to organizations that we know, because we’re asked by people we know, or because we care about the cause and happened to come across them. Major-donor philanthropy is what people who can give upwards of (say) $25,000 do. Most of the time, they give for the same reasons you or I do; but there’s a growing movement for such folks to give in a different way (whether that’s more strategic, more tactical, more informed, more engaged, whatever). Institutional philanthropy is when a major donor sets up a free-standing organization that more or less takes over decision-making for grants. These three are along some kind of a continuum with lots of things in between, but those are the major points along the continuum.

So the first question matters because for all three of these types of donors, their role in a democratic society is becoming more important. Individual donors, as we saw after Haiti, have more tools at their disposal to give, and may – may – be incentivized to give more as a result. You vote with your feet, you vote with your pocketbook, your voice is your vote. When your pocketbook, your voice, and your (virtual) feet are connected through social media, and you see the results in Haiti getting millions or, heck, Obama getting elected, you may – may – think about your own power, and your own role in shaping the conditions of your own life, in a different way. So there’s something there.

Major donors don’t just vote with their pocketbooks on their philanthropic investments, they open them for political candidates and political causes. Major donors activated to be more strategic or tactical philanthropists may – may – think differently about how they engage in politics as donors. Particularly in the wake of Citizens United, when the threat of being overwhelmed by corporate donations is real.  So there’s something there.

And institutional philanthropy, the world of foundations and social investors (yes, I know that’s a problematic conflation, but bear with me), is paying much more attention to the real meaning of public-private partnerships, and what its relationships with government look like. The role of the Tactical Philanthropy community in helping shape criteria around the Social Innovation Fund it seems augurs things to come. So there’s something there.

The second question matters because institutional philanthropy is set up in this country within a legal framework of tax-exemption that was created by government and could be changed by government. In response to the potential for such changes, the classic move within institutional philanthropy has been to say, “don’t regulate us, let us come up with ways to regulate ourselves.” Fine. So what do those look like? Enter discussions of diversity, the 5% payout rule, etc. So are the changes needed to head off potential regulation about making philanthropy more democratic? And what would that mean? What would it look like? So there’s something there.

I’m learning the art of brevity for blog writing, so I’ll stop there for now. But I’ll keep coming back at the outset to my two questions and why they matter, as I start to map out the terrain I’ll cover on this blog.

Share/Save/Email/Bookmark

Tags: , ,

14 Responses to “My two questions and why they matter”

  1. The Blog Briefly Known as "Democratizing Philanthropy?" » Blog Archive » Voting systems and philanthropy Says:

    […] seems like a good excuse to flesh out some of the potential topics for this blog based on my two questions, particularly the second one, “What would it mean to democratize philanthropy?” There […]

  2. The Blog Briefly Known as "Democratizing Philanthropy?" » Blog Archive » CIVETS Says:

    […] What about IVETS? Might be a good place to start exploring the international side of one of my two questions: what is the role of philanthropy in a democratic […]

  3. The Blog Briefly Known as "Democratizing Philanthropy?" » Blog Archive » The I in CIVETS (part 1) Says:

    […] wondering what kind of philanthropy there is in such countries, as a way of getting at the first of my two questions, “what is the role of philanthropy in a democratic […]

  4. The Blog Briefly Known as "Democratizing Philanthropy?" » Blog Archive » The I in CIVETS (part 2) Says:

    […] […]

  5. The Blog Briefly Known as "Democratizing Philanthropy?" » Blog Archive » On “diversity”: the perils of monoculture Says:

    […] second of my two questions is, “what would it mean to democratize philanthropy?” One of the topics this allows me […]

  6. The Blog Briefly Known as "Democratizing Philanthropy?" » Blog Archive » (knock knock) Housekeeping Says:

    […] time to take stock. At the beginning here, I’ve been exploring the space opened up by my two questions, and setting up some fenceposts to mark where I’d ultimately like to divide things up and […]

  7. The Blog Briefly Known as "Democratizing Philanthropy?" » Blog Archive » Freedom isn’t free (part 2) Says:

    […] further, but this is a start at laying out some thoughts that are ultimately closely connected to my two questions: what is the role of philanthropy in a democratic society, and what would it mean to democratize […]

  8. The Blog Briefly Known as "Democratizing Philanthropy?" » Blog Archive » Fire in Cairo Says:

    […] is the role of philanthropy in a democratic society?” is one of my two questions behind this blog. I started writing in the fall about the CIVETS, emerging economies that may be […]

  9. The Blog Briefly Known as "Democratizing Philanthropy?" » Blog Archive » My Own Worst Enemy Says:

    […] […]

  10. The Blog Briefly Known as "Democratizing Philanthropy?" » Blog Archive » Private Eyes Says:

    […] where does this leave one of my two questions – namely, is philanthropy a democratizing force? Let’s take each of the factors in […]

  11. The Blog Briefly Known as "Democratizing Philanthropy?" » Blog Archive » You’re (Not) the One that I Want Says:

    […] – by which I mean the Sandy relief and recovery effort – goes right to the heart of my two questions on this blog: what does it mean to democratize philanthropy, and is philanthropy as a democratizing […]

  12. The Blog Briefly Known as "Democratizing Philanthropy?" » Blog Archive » Express Yourself Says:

    […] two different ways to think about the nexus of money and citizenship, which is ultimately what my two questions in this blog are […]

  13. The Blog Briefly Known as "Democratizing Philanthropy?" » Blog Archive » Upside Down Says:

    […] New Year! My two questions in this blog are about philanthropy and democracy: What does it mean to democratize philanthropy? […]

  14. The Blog Briefly Known as "Democratizing Philanthropy?" » Blog Archive » He Ain’t Heavy, He’s My Brother Says:

    […] leverage factor has something to do with the relationship between philanthropy and democracy, my two questions. Material for future posts….) […]

Leave a Reply